Proof of Stake

• Staking Tokens: Validators lock up a specific amount of cryptocurrency in a smart contract.
• Validation: Chosen validators verify transactions and add them to the blockchain.
• Rewards and Penalties: Validators receive rewards for their participation, typically in the form of the staked cryptocurrency. If validators act maliciously or fail to maintain their nodes, they risk losing their staked tokens, a process known as slashing​.

Finality

Finality in PoS systems means that a transaction becomes irreversible once a certain condition is met. In Ethereum’s PoS, finality is achieved through a system of checkpoint blocks. Validators vote on pairs of checkpoints, and if two-thirds of the total staked ETH vote in favor, the checkpoint is finalized. Reverting a finalized block would require an attacker to lose at least one-third of the total staked ETH​.

Variations of Proof of Stake

Several variations of PoS exist to address different blockchain needs:

• Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS): Stakeholders vote for delegates who validate transactions on their behalf. This system aims to be more scalable and democratic by allowing more participants to have a say in validation​.
• Pure PoS: Individual validators stake tokens and participate directly in block validation.
• Other Variants: Including Tendermint, Ouroboros, and Casper, each with unique features to enhance security and efficiency.

Advantages of Proof of Stake

PoS offers several benefits over PoW, including:

• Energy Efficiency: PoS requires significantly less computational power, reducing energy consumption.
• Security: The economic incentives and penalties ensure validators act in the network’s best interest.
• Scalability: PoS can handle more transactions per second compared to PoW, making it more suitable for large-scale applications.

Challenges and Criticisms of Proof of Stake

Despite its advantages, PoS faces several challenges and criticisms:

• Initial Distribution of Stake: If the initial distribution of tokens is too concentrated, it can lead to centralization and disproportionate influence over the network by large stakeholders.
• 51% Attack: While theoretically less likely in PoS, if a single entity controls over 50% of the staked tokens, they could potentially manipulate the network​.
• Nothing at Stake Problem: In PoS, validators might vote on multiple competing chains since it doesn’t cost them computational resources. Solutions like slashing and finality are proposed to mitigate this issue.

Differences Between PoS and PoW

While PoW relies on solving complex mathematical problems to validate transactions, PoS depends on the economic stake of validators. This fundamental difference leads to several key distinctions:

• Energy Consumption: PoW is energy-intensive, while PoS is energy-efficient.
• Hardware Requirements: PoW requires specialized hardware (ASICs), whereas PoS can be performed with standard computing equipment.
• Security Model: PoW’s security is based on computational power, while PoS relies on economic incentives and penalties.

List of Proof of Stake Networks

PoS has been adopted by numerous blockchain networks, each implementing their unique variants and adaptations:

• Ethereum 2.0: Transitioned from PoW to PoS, using a staking mechanism requiring 32 ETH to become a validator​.
• Cardano: Utilizes Ouroboros, a PoS protocol known for its security and scalability features​.
• Polkadot: Employs Nominated Proof of Stake (NPoS), which allows token holders to nominate validators​.
• Tezos: Uses a PoS mechanism where validators, known as “bakers,” are required to stake tokens to participate in block validation.
• Cosmos: Utilizes Tendermint, a consensus protocol designed for fast finality and high throughput.
  • All chains built on the Cosmos SDK use some form of PoS, including Osmosis, Thorchain, Celestia, Injective, Akash, and hundreds more.
• Algorand: Implements a pure PoS mechanism to achieve fast transactions and robust security.
• EOS: Uses Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), where a small number of delegates validate transactions on behalf of the entire network.
• Avalanche: Employs a novel PoS consensus mechanism to achieve high throughput and low latency​.
• NEO: Uses a consensus mechanism called Delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT), which is a variation of PoS​.
• Binance Smart Chain (BSC): Implements a PoS authority consensus mechanism to enhance transaction speed and reduce costs​.
• Are we missing some? Click the pencil ✏️ in the top right of this page to add whatever’s missing!