Liquid Staking

Liquid staking bridges the gap between the need to secure PoS networks and the desire for liquidity and capital efficiency in the DeFi space. Traditionally, staking requires locking up assets for a fixed period, during which they cannot be accessed or traded. Liquid staking addresses this limitation by issuing LSTs that represent the staked assets, allowing users to maintain liquidity and continue earning staking rewards.

Key Features and Benefits

1. Enhanced Liquidity: LSTs enable users to unlock the value of their staked assets, providing them with liquidity that can be used for trading, lending, borrowing, and other DeFi activities without waiting for lock-up periods to expire​.

2. Yield Generation: By holding LSTs, users can potentially earn additional rewards through various DeFi protocols, effectively multiplying their staking returns​.

3. Accessibility: Liquid staking lowers the barrier to entry for staking, allowing users with smaller amounts of crypto to participate and earn rewards without maintaining complex staking infrastructure.

Risks and Challenges

1. Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: The security of liquid staking protocols relies heavily on smart contracts, which, despite audits, can still be susceptible to bugs and exploits.

2. Slashing Risk: Users are exposed to slashing penalties if the chosen validators act maliciously or unreliably. This risk is inherent in outsourcing staking to third-party providers​.

3. Market Volatility: The value of LSTs can fluctuate, sometimes trading at a discount to the underlying assets, especially during market shocks or liquidity crunches​.

Terminology: LSTs vs LSDs

Key Differences

While very often used interchangeably, LST (Liquid Staking Tokens) and LSD (Liquid Staking Derivatives) have subtle distinctions that may become more important as time goes on:

• Representation: LSTs directly represent a user’s staked asset, whereas LSDs are derivative instruments whose value is derived from LSTs​.
• Voting Rights: LSTs typically offer direct voting rights on the underlying staked asset, while LSDs might not.
• Complexity: LSTs are generally considered less complex and more user-friendly than LSDs.

Regulatory and Industry Perspective

The Proof of Stake Alliance (POSA) and industry experts emphasize using the term LST over LSD for clarity and regulatory reasons. LSTs should not be considered securities or swaps under U.S. federal laws, and their conversion should not be a taxable event. This clear terminology aids in the broader adoption and regulatory acceptance of liquid staking technology.

Prominent Liquid Staking Protocol Examples

1. Lido (Ethereum and More)

Lido is one of the largest liquid staking protocols, offering services on Ethereum, Solana, and other networks. Users can stake their tokens and receive stETH, stMATIC, or stSOL, which can be used in DeFi applications while still earning staking rewards​.

2. Stride (Cosmos Ecosystem)

Stride provides liquid staking solutions primarily within the Cosmos ecosystem, allowing users to stake tokens from various PoS chains in the Cosmos network and receive corresponding liquid staking tokens.

3. Jito (Solana)

Jito offers liquid staking for the Solana blockchain with its jitoSOL token. It focuses on maximizing staking rewards by leveraging Miner Extractable Value (MEV) strategies, providing additional incentives for stakers​.

Is there something incorrect, lacking in detail, or totally missing from this page? If so, feel free to fix or add it yourself, here. ✏️